Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points
Date
Msg-id 20120828022029.GD6786@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 07:43:49PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > I need someone to review this patch for 9.3.  We have already missed
> > fixing this for 9.2.
> 
> So put it in the next commitfest.
> 
> FWIW, I looked at this last week, and concluded I didn't have enough
> confidence in it to push it into 9.2 at the last minute.
> 
> There's also the big-picture question of whether we should just get rid
> of fuzzy comparisons in the geometric types instead of trying to hack
> indexes to work around them.  I'd really rather have us debate that
> question and resolve it one way or the other before spending time on the
> details of patches that take the second approach.

Done.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: FATAL: bogus data in lock file "postmaster.pid": ""
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Incorrect behaviour when using a GiST index on points