Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6
Date
Msg-id 20120827135022.GF11088@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6  (Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>)
Responses Re: Caching for stable expressions with constant arguments v6
List pgsql-hackers
Where are we on this?

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 07:06:45PM +0200, Marti Raudsepp wrote:
> Hi list,
> 
> Here's v6 of my expression caching patch. The only change in v6 is
> added expression cost estimation in costsize.c. I'm setting per-tuple
> cost of CacheExpr to 0 and moving sub-expression tuple costs into the
> startup cost.
> 
> As always, this work is also available from my Github "cache" branch:
> https://github.com/intgr/postgres/commits/cache
> 
> This patch was marked as "Returned with Feedback" from the 2011-11
> commitfest. I expected to get to tweak the patch in response to
> feedback before posting to the next commitfest. But said feedback
> didn't arrive, and with me being on vacation, I missed the 2012-01 CF
> deadline. :(
> 
> I will add it to the 2012-01 commitfest now, I hope that's OK. If not,
> feel free to remove it and I'll put it in 2012-Next.
> 
> PS: Jaime, have you had a chance to look at the patch? Even if you're
> not done with the review, I'd be glad to get some comments earlier.
> And thanks for reviewing.
> 
> Regards,
> Marti
> 
> -- 
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: archive_keepalive_command
Next
From: "Dirk Lutzebäck"
Date:
Subject: hunspell and tsearch2 ?