Re: -Wformat-zero-length - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Date
Msg-id 20120803200228.GI3463@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: -Wformat-zero-length  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Re: -Wformat-zero-length
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Aug  3, 2012 at 04:01:18PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> >> I don't disagree with pg_upgrade being operationally complex, but I
> >> don't see how this relates to contrib vs. non-contrib at all.  Are we
> >> supposed to only have "simple" programs in src/bin?  That seems a
> >> strange policy.
> >
> > Well, perhaps we need to re-open the discussion then.
> 
> I feel like putting it in src/bin would carry an implication of
> robustness that I'm not sanguine about.  Granted, putting it in
> contrib has already pushed the envelope in that direction further than
> is perhaps warranted.  But ISTM that if we ever want to put this in
> src/bin someone needs to devote some serious engineering time to
> filing down the rough edges.

I don't know how to file down any of the existing rough edges.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: -Wformat-zero-length
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: [WIP] Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation