Re: BUG #6785: Memory Leak in plpgsql - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: BUG #6785: Memory Leak in plpgsql
Date
Msg-id 20120730161416.GB10877@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: BUG #6785: Memory Leak in plpgsql  (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-bugs
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 05:56:22PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, July 30, 2012 05:38:07 PM Anderson Valadares wrote:
> > I understand, but the memory should not be returned after the execution of
> > the function?
> Well, that depends on how memory was allocated by the libc. When it used brk()
> to allocate memory its rather likely that the memory cannot directly be
> returned because some block of memory in the new memory is still used by some
> permanent memory context.
>
> > Below is the result of running with more than 55,000 calls.
> >
> > PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT SWAP  RES CODE DATA  SHR S P %CPU %MEM    TIME+
> >  COMMAND
> > 618 postgres  15   0 1687m 1.2g 507m 4684 505m 3796 S 1  0.0  4.2   0:04.90
> > postgres: postgres test [local] idle
> Interesting. I just let the thing run - by accident - for 30+ minutes and it
> still hovered at 96MB.

FYI, I did a blog entry that mentions when memory is returned:

    http://momjian.us/main/blogs/pgblog/2012.html#February_1_2012

Specifically, only single memory allocations greater than MMAP_THRESHOLD
are returned to the operating system.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6785: Memory Leak in plpgsql
Next
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: BUG #6774: FOR IN SELECT LOOP ignores ORDER BY