Re: segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string - Mailing list pgsql-odbc

From Lionel Elie Mamane
Subject Re: segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string
Date
Msg-id 20120723142117.GE10727@capsaicin.mamane.lu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: segfault in SQLSpecialColumns when table name is null string  (Hiroshi Inoue <inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-odbc
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 06:04:23AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
> (2012/07/16 1:40), Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:50:40AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>> (2012/07/15 14:02), Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>>>> On Sun, Jul 15, 2012 at 06:50:27AM +0900, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:
>>>>> (2012/07/10 23:27), Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:

>>>>>> Also, the ultimate reason for this "strange thing" is that

>>>>>>    SQLColAttribute( (SQLHANDLE) 0x1ec7850,
>>>>>>                     (SQLUSMALLINT) 1,
>>>>>>                     (SQLUSMALLINT) 15,
>>>>>>                     (SQLPOINTER) 0x1eb2640,
>>>>>>                     128,
>>>>>>                     (SQLSMALLINT *) 0x7fffffff97de,
>>>>>>                     NULL);

>>>>>> where 15 == SQL_DESC_TABLE_NAME == SQL_COLUMN_TABLE_NAME
>>>>>> returns (writes at 0x1eb2640) an empty string for this query:

>>>>>>     SELECT "Num" "Numero", "data" FROM "foo"."Table1"

>>>>> What is your environment e.g. the version of your PG server
>>>>> or the version of your psqlodbc?

> Please set the following.
> Protocol                = 7.4

That is not among the choices offered by ODBCConfig; I can take 6.4,
6.3 or 6.2.

Editing the ~/.odbc.ini file by hand, indeed it "solves" the issue. As
does completely removing the "Protocol = ..." line.

> Setting
> UseServerSidePrepare    = 1
> is also recommended.

That is also not among the choices offered by ODBCConfig; I have the
following boolean choices:

ReadOnly
RowVersioning
ShowSystemTables
ShowOidColumn
FakeOidIndex

I'm fairly sure ODBCConfig does not have these options (and possible
values) hardcoded, but gets them by interrogating the driver (or
rather its companion libodbcpsqlS.so?); 't would be a good idea to
keep that in sync with what the actual driver supports.

--
Lionel

pgsql-odbc by date:

Previous
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: question re org.postgresql.util.PSQLException
Next
From: ranjeeth kumar
Date:
Subject: Regarding PostgreSQL BIT datatype binding in ODBC.......