Re: During Xlog replaying, is there maybe emitted xlog? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From xu2002261
Subject Re: During Xlog replaying, is there maybe emitted xlog?
Date
Msg-id 201207181016343750030@163.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to During Xlog replaying, is there maybe emitted xlog?  ("xu2002261" <xu2002261@163.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Thanks a lot.
 
oops, indeed, the clean up stage is not in the XLog replay, So there is no problem.
 
 
2012-07-18

xu2002261

发件人: Tom Lane
发送时间: 2012-07-18  10:05:26
收件人: xu2002261
抄送: pgsql-hackers
主题: Re: [HACKERS] During Xlog replaying, is there maybe emitted xlog?
"xu2002261" <xu2002261@163.com> writes:
> Hi all,
>      I reviewed the source code, and saw the following calling path:
>      StartupXLOG() > StartupDatabase() > RmgrTable[rmid].rm_cleanup() > btree_xlog_cleanup() > _bt_insert_parent > _bt_insertonpg() > XLogInsert()
> As we can see, during xlog replaying, XLog may be emitted. So whether there are some *ISSUE* in above calling stack?
No, it's entirely correct.  That path isn't "during" replay, it's upon
completion of replay, where we're cleaning up anything that failed to be
completed before the crash.  Emitting more WAL is allowed then.  Note
the comment a few lines above the rm_cleanup calls:
/*
 * Resource managers might need to write WAL records, eg, to record
 * index cleanup actions.  So temporarily enable XLogInsertAllowed in
 * this process only.
 */
regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: During Xlog replaying, is there maybe emitted xlog?
Next
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation