On Fri, Jun 08, 2012 at 11:32:40AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:48 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Should this be back-patched? (Problem first reported in PG 9.1 due to
> > the removal of a backward-compatibility symlink.) I am not sure we have
> > had enough problem reports to warrant it (3 reports).
>
> We back-patch a lot of things based on a single report. Three is a lot.
OK, batckpatched to Postgres 9.1. I don't think anyone is still major
release upgrading to 9.0 or earlier.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
