On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 05:48:58PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Wed, Jun 06, 2012 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> We already support multiple TCP sockets, so multiple Unix sockets
> >> shouldn't be that much extra trouble.
>
> > We do? I didn't think listening on multiple interfaces meant we
> > listened on multiple sockets. Is there something else?
>
> There's one socket for each entry in the listen_addresses list,
> plus one for the Unix socket.
Oh, how do we handle '*'? We pass that to the kernel, I assume. Shame
there is "wildcard" ability for unix domain sockets, which would use any
directory --- guess that wouldn't work out well. ;-)
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
