On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 02:39:28PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 11:31:12AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I don't recall exactly what problems drove us to make pg_upgrade do
> >> what it does with extensions, but we need a different fix for them.
>
> > Uh, pg_upgrade doesn't do anything special with extensions, so it must
> > have been something people did in pg_dump.
>
> Most of the dirty work is in pg_dump --binary_upgrade, but it's pretty
> disingenuous of you to disavow responsibility for those kluges. They
> are part and parcel of pg_upgrade IMO.
True. I was just saying I did not write any of that code and have not
studied it.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
