Re: Temporary tables under hot standby - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Noah Misch
Subject Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Date
Msg-id 20120429200258.GB14509@tornado.leadboat.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Temporary tables under hot standby  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:55:15PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Concerning everyone's favorite topic, how to name the new type of table, I
> liked Tom's proposal[1] to make CREATE TEMP TABLE retain current behavior and
> have CREATE GLOBAL TEMP TABLE and/or CREATE LOCAL TEMP TABLE request the new
> SQL-standard variety.  (I'd vote for using CREATE GLOBAL and retaining CREATE
> LOCAL for future expansion.)  As he mentions, to get there, we'd ideally start
> by producing a warning instead of silently accepting GLOBAL as a noise word.
> Should we put such a warning into 9.2?

Here is the change I'd make.

Thanks,
nm

> [1] http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/5422.1240936705@sss.pgh.pa.us

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: default_transaction_isolation = serializable causes crash under Hot Standby
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: xReader, double-effort (was: Temporary tables under hot standby)