Re: Tom Lane 2012-04-04 <28647.1333558029@sss.pgh.pa.us>
> Now, Scott's comment seems to me to offer a principled way out of this:
> if we define the intended semantics of search_path as being similar
> to the traditional understanding of Unix PATH, then it's not an error
> or even unexpected to have references to nonexistent schemas in there.
Btw, the default setting does already work like this: "$user",public.
It is not an error for "$user" not to exist, but it is a very nice
default because it will be used as soon as it appears.
It would be logical to treat all other cases the same. I then could
put the search_path into my .psqlrc and then have a "one size fits
all" search path for all my databases, etc...
> But as soon as you say "I want warnings in some cases", I think we have
> a mess that nobody is ever going to be happy with, because there will
> never be a clear and correct definition of which cases should get
> warnings.
As it looks impossible to divide the gray area, I'd opt to just drop
the warning and accept all syntactically valid strings.
Christoph
--
cb@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/
