Re: ECPG FETCH readahead - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Meskes
Subject Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
Date
Msg-id 20120329183448.GA14785@feivel.credativ.lan
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: ECPG FETCH readahead  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Responses Re: ECPG FETCH readahead
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 01:03:41PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
> Still, we're looking at dedicated ECPG syntax, quite visible even to folks
> with no interest in Informix.  We have eschewed littering our syntax with
> compatibility aids, and I like it that way.  IMO, an option to the "ecpg"
> preprocessor is an acceptable level of muddle to provide this aid.  A DECLARE
> CURSOR syntax extension goes too far.

+1 from me.

Let's not add special ecpg sql syntax if we don't absolutely have to.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
Jabber: michael.meskes at googlemail dot com
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Finer Extension dependencies