Re: Command Triggers, v16 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Command Triggers, v16
Date
Msg-id 201203160913.54219.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Command Triggers, v16  (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Command Triggers, v16  (Thom Brown <thombrown@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thursday, March 15, 2012 11:41:21 PM Thom Brown wrote:
> On 15 March 2012 22:06, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndquadrant.fr> wrote:
> > Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> >>> At this moment in time, CTAS is still outstanding.  Is the plan to try
> >>> to get that in for this release, or as an enhancement in 9.3?
> >> 
> >> The plan is to get CTAS as a utility command in 9.2 then update the
> >> command trigger patch to benefit from the new situation. We've been
> >> wondering about making its own commit fest entry for that patch, it's
> >> now clear in my mind, that needs to happen.
> > 
> >  https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=823
> 
> Looks like the ctas-on-command-triggers-01.patch patch needs re-basing.
I can do that - but imo the other patch (not based on the command triggers 
stuff) is the relevant for now as this patch ought to be applied before 
command triggers. It doesn't seem to make too much sense to rebase it 
frequently as long as the command triggers patch isn't stable...

Any reason you would prefer it being rebased?

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Yeb Havinga
Date:
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Add GUC sepgsql.client_label
Next
From: Christian Ullrich
Date:
Subject: Re: Command Triggers, v16