Hello,
> Note I dropped the row processor from under PGresult.
> Please don't put it back there.
I overlooked that. I understand it.
> > This seems also can be done by the return value of
> > PQsetRowProcessor() (currently void). Anyway, I provide this
> > function and also change the return value of PQsetRowProcessor().
>
> Note you need processorParam as well.
> I think it's simpler to rely on PQgetProcessor()
Hmm. Ok.
> > Let me confirm the effects of this function. Is the below
> > description right?
> >
> > - PQskipResult(conn, false) makes just following PQgetResult() to
> > skip current bunch of rows and the consequent PQgetResult()'s
> > gathers rows as usual.
>
> Yes.
>
> > - PQskipResult(conn, true) makes all consequent PQgetResult()'s
> > to skip all the rows.
Well, Is this right?
> > If this is right, row processor should stay also in PGresult
> > context. PQskipResult() replaces the row processor in PGconn when
> > the second parameter is true, and in PGresult for false.
>
> No, let's keep row processor only under PGconn.
Then, Should I add the stash for the row processor (and needless
for param) to recall after in PGconn?
regards,
--
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center
