Re: JSON for PG 9.2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Abhijit Menon-Sen
Subject Re: JSON for PG 9.2
Date
Msg-id 20120131182959.GA5577@toroid.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: JSON for PG 9.2  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: JSON for PG 9.2
List pgsql-hackers
At 2012-01-31 12:04:31 -0500, robertmhaas@gmail.com wrote:
>
> That fails to answer the question of what we ought to do if we get an
> invalid sequence there.

I think it's best to categorically reject invalid surrogates as early as
possible, considering the number of bugs that are related to them (not
in Postgres, just in general). I can't see anything good coming from
letting them in and leaving them to surprise someone in future.

-- ams


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: no error context for index updates?
Next
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: JSON for PG 9.2