Re: autovacuum and default_transaction_isolation - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:04:23PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> Hmm.  Shouldn't we make the autovac launcher use READ COMMITTED, too?

Yeah, probably. That one doesn't seem so important because its
transactions aren't long-running (IIRC, it only starts a transaction to
scan pg_database). But it wouldn't hurt to keep it from pointlessly
registering a serializable transaction.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/