* Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> Heikki's idea is probably superior so far as PG backend usage is
> concerned in isolation, but I wonder if there are scenarios where a
> client application would like to be able to manage libpq's allocations.
The answer to that is certainly 'yes'. It was one of the first things
that I complained about when moving from Oracle to PG. With OCI, you
can bulk load results directly into application-allocated memory areas.
Haven't been following the dblink discussion, so not going to comment
about that piece.
Thanks,
Stephen
