Re: Materialized views - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: Materialized views
Date
Msg-id 20111108225401.GX24234@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Materialized views  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: Materialized views
Re: Materialized views
Re: Materialized views
List pgsql-hackers
* Kevin Grittner (Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov) wrote:
> So the question is, would a
> patch which does the first two without the third be accepted by the
> community?

I'm about 99% sure the answer to that is 'yes'.  Are you thinking of
having a background scheduler which handles the updating of
schedule-driven (instead of trigger-driven) MVs..?  Not to try to
feature-creep this on you, but you might consider how a new backend
process which handles scheduled tasks could be generalized to go beyond
handling just MV updates.. :)
Thanks!
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Jaskiewicz
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Materialized views