Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Date
Msg-id 201110040150.p941oHp17566@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2011 06:45 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of lun oct 03 17:28:53 -0300 2011:
> >>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >>>> Well, we have the Gentoo developer in this very thread.  I'm sure they
> >>>> would fix their command line if we gave them a pg_ctl that worked.
> >>>> Surely the package that contains the init script also contains pg_ctl,
> >>>> so they would both be upgraded simultaneously.
> >>> What is the fix?  If they started the server by using --data-directory,
> >>> pg_ctl stop has no way to find the postmaster.pid file, and hence stop
> >>> the server.  Are you suggesting we remove this ability?
> >> I am suggesting they don't start it by using --data-directory in the
> >> first place.
> > Agreed.  If you remove that, the logical problem goes away and it
> > becomes a simple problem of dumping the contents of postgresql.conf and
> > having pg_ctl (and pg_upgrade) use that.  Let me look at how much code
> > that would take.
> >
> 
> Yeah, this pattern can be changed to have a config file that reads:
> 
>     data_directory = '/path/to/data'
>     include '/path/to/common/config'
> 
> and I presume (or hope) that would meet your need, and not upset the FHS 
> purists.

Actually, the existing setup is fine as long as there is something that
tell us where to find the data directory.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Aidan Van Dyk
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Next
From: "Dickson S. Guedes"
Date:
Subject: Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer