Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Date
Msg-id 201110031815.p93IFlm28727@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
List pgsql-hackers
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> >
> > I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design
> > to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we
> > could get away with removing it.
> >
> >             
> 
> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone 
> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to 
> make it work as best we can.

I disagree.  If people were using it we would have had many more bug
reports about pg_ctl not working.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories