Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
Subject Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date
Msg-id 20110930.112443.111535170.horiguchi.kyotaro@oss.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp  (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
List pgsql-hackers
Hello,

I understand that it has been at least practically no problem.

Ok, I send this patch to comitters.

Thanks for your dealing with nuisance questions.


At Thu, 29 Sep 2011 21:21:32 +0900, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote in
<CAHGQGwG0C21F0CZY5ExX-49dxdx7hJuNeiBBJ0Tzvh+7vMXWgw@mail.gmail.com>
> >> > Nevertheless this is ok for all OSs, I don't know whether
> >> > initializing TimestampTz(double, int64 is ok) field with 8 bytes
...
> I believe it's safe. Such a code is placed elsewhere in the source, too.
> If it's unsafe, we should have received lots of bug reports related
> to that. But we've not.

Regards,

-- 
Kyotaro Horiguchi
NTT Open Source Software Center


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Fujii Masao
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: bug of recovery?