Re: superusers are members of all roles? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Date
Msg-id 20110912023207.GQ12765@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: superusers are members of all roles?  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Responses Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Re: superusers are members of all roles?
List pgsql-hackers
* Andrew Dunstan (andrew@dunslane.net) wrote:
> >    Address problem where superusers are assumed to be members of all groups
> >
> >        http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-04/msg00337.php
>
> This turns out to be a one-liner.

I really don't know that I agree with removing this, to be honest..  I
haven't got time at the moment to really discuss it, but at the very
least, not being able to 'set role' to any user when postgres would be
REALLY annoying..
Thanks,
    Stephen

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: superusers are members of all roles?