Re: Large C files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Large C files
Date
Msg-id 201109081429.p88ETEh29709@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Large C files  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Large C files
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> > On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> >>> Please lets not waste effort on refactoring efforts in mid dev cycle.
> 
> >> Say what? �When else would you have us do it?
> 
> > When else would you have us develop?
> 
> In my eyes that sort of activity *is* development.  I find the
> distinction you are drawing entirely artificial, and more calculated to
> make sure refactoring never happens than to add any safety.  Any
> significant development change carries a risk of breakage.

I ran pgrminclude a week ago and that is certainly a larger change than
this.  Early in the development cycle people are merging in their saved
patches, so now is a fine time to do refactoring.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: concurrent snapshots
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: Large C files