Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers
Date
Msg-id 201109071324.p87DORC05280@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers  (Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-docs
Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> >> How about a doc tweak like the attached?
> >
> > Perfect. ?Applied to 9.0, 9.1, and head. ?Thanks. ?Sorry for the delay.
>
> Err, as Tom's first comment in this thread explains, Pavel and I were
> both wrong: the variables in question are indeed NULL, not undefined.
> I think the docs were fine the way they were.

OK, reverted.  I did not see Tom's comment.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Josh Kupershmidt
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers
Next
From: Pavel Stehule
Date:
Subject: Re: [BUGS] documentation bug - behave of NEW a OLD in plpgsql's triggers