Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for - Mailing list pgsql-committers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Date
Msg-id 201109062119.p86LJ2F12257@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-committers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> This comment seems inaccurate and bizarrely placed.  What question
> >> were you trying to answer?
>
> > It was in response to my email where I asked why we are sending cache
> > invalidation messages for temporary tables that can't be seen by any
> > other backends:
> >     http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-03/msg00844.php
>
> Oh.  OK, I cleaned it up a bit.

Thanks.  Good to have it documented.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-committers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add C comment about why we send cache invalidation messages for
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: pgsql: Add documentation suggestion about adding a comment to the top o