Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem
Date
Msg-id 201108311825.p7VIPim14330@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade problem  (daveg <daveg@sonic.net>)
Responses toast error after pg_upgrade 9.0.4 -> 9.1rc1
List pgsql-hackers
FYI, I am working with depesz on IM right now and will report back when
we have a cause of the bug.  FYI, I was without electric power for 53
hours, which is why I am late in replying to this report.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

daveg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 07:49:24PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 06:54:41PM +0200, hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > vacuumdb: vacuuming of database "etsy_v2" failed: ERROR:  could not access status of transaction 3429738606
> > DETAIL:  Could not open file "pg_clog/0CC6": No such file or directory.
> > 
> > Interestingly.
> > 
> > In old dir there is pg_clog directory with files:
> > 0AC0 .. 0DAF (including 0CC6, size 262144)
> > but new pg_clog has only:
> > 0D2F .. 0DB0
> > 
> > File content - nearly all files that exist in both places are the same, with exception of 2 newest ones in new
datadir:
> > 3c5122f3e80851735c19522065a2d12a  0DAF
> > 8651fc2b9fa3d27cfb5b496165cead68  0DB0
> > 
> > 0DB0 doesn't exist in old, and 0DAF has different md5sum: 7d48996c762d6a10f8eda88ae766c5dd
> > 
> > one more thing. I did select count(*) from transactions and it worked.
> > 
> > that's about it. I can probably copy over files from old datadir to new (in
> > pg_clog/), and will be happy to do it, but I'll wait for your call - retry with
> > copies files might destroy some evidence.
> 
> I had this same thing happen this Saturday just past and my client had to
> restore the whole 2+ TB instance from the previous days pg_dumps.
> I had been thinking that perhaps I did something wrong in setting up or
> running the upgrade, but had not found it yet. Now that I see Hubert has
> the same problem it is starting to look like pg_upgrade can eat all your
> data.
> 
> After running pg_upgrade apparently successfully and analyzeing all the
> tables we restarted the production workload and started getting errors:
> 
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015  12337  c06  postgres  ERROR:  could not access status of transaction 2923961093
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015  12337  c06  postgres  DETAIL:  Could not open file "pg_clog/0AE4": No such file or
directory.
> 2011-08-27 04:18:34.015  12337  c06  postgres  STATEMENT:  analyze public.b_pxx;
> 
> On examination the pg_clog directory contained on two files timestamped
> after the startup of the new cluster with 9.0.4. Other hosts that upgraded
> successfully had numerous files in pg_clog dating back a few days. So it
> appears that all the clog files went missing during the upgrade somehow.
> a
> This happened upgrading from 8.4.7 to 9.0.4, with a brief session in between
> at 8.4.8. We have upgraded several hosts to 9.0.4 successfully previously.
> 
> -dg
> 
> -- 
> David Gould       daveg@sonic.net      510 536 1443    510 282 0869
> If simplicity worked, the world would be overrun with insects.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: limit in subquery causes poor selectivity estimation
Next
From: "Ross J. Reedstrom"
Date:
Subject: Re: sha1, sha2 functions into core?