On August 31, 2011 11:56:56 AM Andy Colson wrote:
> On 8/31/2011 1:51 PM, Alan Hodgson wrote:
> > On August 31, 2011 11:26:57 AM Andy Colson wrote:
> >> When you ran it, did it really feel like 30 seconds? Or did it come
> >> right back real quick?
> >>
> >> Because your report says:
> >> > 35.833 ms
> >>
> >> Thats ms, or milliseconds, or 0.035 seconds.
> >
> > I think the "." is a thousands separator in some locales, possibly the
> > reason for confusion.
>
> D'oh. I'm zero for two today. Guess I'll call it a day.
>
Oh, no, you were right. I think the original poster is European, though and
misread the output.
