Re: USECS_* constants undefined with float8 timestamps? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: USECS_* constants undefined with float8 timestamps?
Date
Msg-id 201108122128.p7CLSF422930@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: USECS_* constants undefined with float8 timestamps?  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: USECS_* constants undefined with float8 timestamps?
List pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Johann 'Myrkraverk' Oskarsson
> <johann@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just noticed that the USECS_* constants are not defined when the server
> > is compiled without integer dates and timestamps.
> >
> > Explicitly, timestamp.h is
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
> > #define USECS_PER_DAY   INT64CONST(86400000000)
> > #define USECS_PER_HOUR  INT64CONST(3600000000)
> > #define USECS_PER_MINUTE INT64CONST(60000000)
> > #define USECS_PER_SEC   INT64CONST(1000000)
> > #endif
> >
> > Is there a particular reason for this? ?Even with float8 timestamps
> > there are uses for these constants in extensions.
> 
> I don't see any particular reason not define them unconditionally.

Well, they are only used by integer dates, so why expand their
visibility?  The define does make it clear how they are used.  I suppose
if someone wanted to use them outside that case, we could open them up. 
It is true that with integer dates now the default, we might find that
someone introduces compile problems by using them outside the integer
dates scope.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Inserting heap tuples in bulk in COPY
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: index-only scans