Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David Fetter
Subject Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion
Date
Msg-id 20110801202357.GC4014@fetter.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion
Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion
Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 01, 2011 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:46 PM, David Fetter <david@fetter.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:32:03PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> > I think you had better plan on incorporating GNU readline into
> >> > installer builds for Lion.
> >>
> >> Unfortunately the licence makes that a non-starter.
> >
> > What is it about a GPLed psql client that is a non-starter for the
> > installer?  I'm not a fan of the GPL, but in this case, the
> > effects of linking it in are quite limited in scope, i.e. they
> > pertain to exactly one binary.
> 
> The scope or number of files is irrelevant. Having just a single
> GPL'd file in those installers makes it impossible for ISVs to
> bundle them with their products, unless they open source them under
> a GPL compatible licence.

I know of no one, not even the wackiest AGPL loony-tune, who claims
that the GPL is infectious to the degree you're describing.  Are you
*sure* the reason you state is the actual reason?

Cheers,
David.
-- 
David Fetter <david@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778  AIM: dfetter666  Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter      XMPP: david.fetter@gmail.com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Common object property boards