Re: Need help understanding pg_locks - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Need help understanding pg_locks
Date
Msg-id 201107131858.p6DIwhk24819@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Need help understanding pg_locks  (Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Florian Pflug wrote:
> We could also get rid of the noun completely by saying
> 
>   (D)
>   "Locked page number within the relation, or null if it isn't
>    a tuple or relation page that is locked".
> 
> I personally slightly favor (D).

I don't think we can use "Locked" here because the lock might not be
granted.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child
Next
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Re: Small patch for GiST: move childoffnum to child