On Monday, June 20, 2011 17:11:14 Greg Stark wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp@phlo.org> wrote:
> > Are you sure? Isn't mmap()ing /dev/null a way to *allocate* memory?
> >
> > Or at least this is what I always thought glibc does when you malloc()
>
> It mmaps /dev/zero actually.
As the nitpicking has already started: Afair its just passing -1 as fd and
uses the MAP_ANONYMOUS flag argument ;)
Andres
