Re: patch: update README-SSI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dan Ports
Subject Re: patch: update README-SSI
Date
Msg-id 20110616173356.GD83336@csail.mit.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: patch: update README-SSI  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: patch: update README-SSI
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 04:39:09PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> There's no mention on what T1 is. I believe it's supposed to be Tin, in 
> the terminology used in the graph.

Yes, I changed the naming after I originally wrote it, and missed a
couple spots. T1 should be Tin.

> I don't see how there can be a ww-dependency between T0 and Tin. There 
> can't be a rw-conflict because Tin is read-only, so surely there can't 
> be a ww-conflict either?

Yes, it can only be a wr-conflict. Good catch.

Dan

-- 
Dan R. K. Ports              MIT CSAIL                http://drkp.net/


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: starting to review the Extend NOT NULL representation to pg_constraint patch
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users