Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Date
Msg-id 201106160152.p5G1q2o05906@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Stephen Frost wrote:
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> * Bruce Momjian (bruce@momjian.us) wrote:
> > Having long options mean different than short options seems very
> > confusing.
> 
> Err, that wasn't what I was proposing..  Just having:
> --old-port-during-upgrade
> 
> and similar would have to be used if they want to specify the ports to
> be used during the upgrade proces...
> 
> We just wouldn't have a short-option for that option, since we
> discourage it..

I think that is going to be very hard to document --- seems easier to
just use -p and -P always.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade using appname to lock out other users
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Why polecat and colugos are failing to build back branches