On June 12, 2011 12:34:27 PM Jean-Yves F. Barbier wrote:
> The logical way would be to stuff only one table with these images, however
> wouldn't it be faster (in regard to long term accumulation) to have several
> images tables (picture, datasheet, supdoc & clidoc) instead?
It would definitely make maintenance easier to split them up.
Big tables are a pain.