On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 02:35:58 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 02:14:00 AM Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 01:56:05 AM C=E9dric Villemain wrote:
> > > I remove my own explanations as we conclude on the same thing.
> > > Attached is the fix by adding a (!reindex) in the index.c if().
> >=20
> > Thats imo wrong because it will break a plain REINDEX?
>=20
> > I think one possible correct fix would be the attached:
> My version was wrong as well because it did not observe RelationTruncate=
's
> nblocks argument. That function is used to "shorten" the relation in
> vacuum. So dropping the init fork there is not a good idea.
>=20
> So I think it is the simpler version of simply checking the existance of
> the fork before creating is ok.
Gna. gnargl. Coffe. Bed. ;)
There was an accidental hunk I added while removing some whitespace. That=
=20
would not have been good on a real commit.
Argh.
