On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 01:56:05 AM C=E9dric Villemain wrote:
> I remove my own explanations as we conclude on the same thing.
> Attached is the fix by adding a (!reindex) in the index.c if().
Thats imo wrong because it will break a plain REINDEX?
I think one possible correct fix would be the attached:
Andres