Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?
Date
Msg-id 201105110059.p4B0xcx18975@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Why not install pgstattuple by default?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> >> here are the sizes of the built RPMs from my last build for Fedora:
> >> 
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl  3839458 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl   490788 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-contrib-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl 27337677 Apr 18 10:51 postgresql-debuginfo-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl   961660 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-devel-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl  7569048 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-docs-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl   246506 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-libs-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl    64940 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-plperl-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl    65776 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-plpython-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl    45941 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-pltcl-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl  5302117 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-server-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl  1370509 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-test-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> >> -rw-r--r--. 1 tgl tgl  3644113 Apr 18 10:50 postgresql-upgrade-9.0.4-1.fc13.x86_64.rpm
> 
> > Is that last one pg_upgrade?  It seems very big.
> 
> pg_upgrade plus a supporting set of 8.4 files ...

OK, where do I get to dance around that pg_upgrade is packaged in Fedora
thanks to you?  At PGCon?  LOL

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: the big picture for index-only scans