On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 03:21:05 PM Radosław Smogura wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 14:25:10 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 26, 2011 01:59:45 PM Radosław Smogura wrote:
> >> I didn't followed this topic carefully, so sorry If I wrote
> >>
> >> something
> >>
> >> that was written, but I thought about following approach at least
> >>
> >> for
> >>
> >> message sending, etc.:
> >>
> >> 1. When initializing MemoryContext (pool) give one parameter that
> >>
> >> will
> >>
> >> be stack size. Stack is addition to normal operations.
> >
> > You can't allocate memory on the stack and return that.
> >
> > Andres
>
> I didn't wrote allocate on stack. I thought about preallocate n bytes
> chunk for stack-like memory but without popping.
The implementation already does something like that.
