Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful
Date
Msg-id 201104122111.25457.andres@anarazel.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 09:00:40 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> > On Tuesday, April 12, 2011 08:09:53 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >> 1. The existing names with a "C" appended (eg, OidFunctionCall2C) will
> >> take a collation argument (in particular, this replaces the existing
> >> DirectFunctionCall1WithCollation and DirectFunctionCall2WithCollation,
> >> which seem a bit verbosely named for my tastes).
> > 
> > The first thing I though when I saw OidFunctionCall2C was Function Call
> > with C collation or such and that you wanted to rename all the existing
> > calls to that...
> 
> Hm, well, you got a better idea?  I definitely want it *short*, because
> these are going to be in a lot of places.
Not really. Maybe DirectFunctionCall1Coll  or even DirectFCall1Coll...

Andres


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: fn_collation in FmgrInfo considered harmful