Re: Problem with pg_upgrade? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
Date
Msg-id 201103301939.p2UJd5403598@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Problem with pg_upgrade?
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On ons, 2011-03-30 at 10:57 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Also, I am unclear if this is really our bug.  At least one of the
> > systems was on Ubuntu/Debian, and they might both have been, and I know
> > Debian changes our source code.  Where can I find a copy of the diffs
> > they have made?
> 
> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~pitti/postgresql/debian-9.0/files/head:/debian/patches/

These all seem reasonable, but I am confused by this.  Someone reported
last week that the equals sign is not optional in postgreql.conf on
Debian but I don't see that patch in here.  Also I thought they modified
pg_hba.conf in some odd way.  Are these changes no longer made in 9.0?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Merlin Moncure
Date:
Subject: Re: Process local hint bit cache
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_upgrade and PGCLIENTENCODING