Re: template0 database comment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: template0 database comment
Date
Msg-id 201103121359.p2CDxTU28901@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: template0 database comment  (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>)
Responses Re: template0 database comment
Re: template0 database comment
Re: template0 database comment
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page wrote:
> On 3/12/11, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> >> People are confused about what template0 is for, so I created the
> >> attached one-line patch to add a database comment to template0. No
> >> initdb, I assume, becuase it is just a comment.
> >
> >> +         "COMMENT ON DATABASE template0 IS 'only used by pg_dump';\n",
> >
> > No objection to the concept, but the actual text of this comment is
> > approximately 100% wrong.
> >
> 
> I'd like to lodge a formal objection to the use of the word
> 'approximately' in the above comment.

OK, funny guys.  ;-)  Can someone give me the right text.  Obviously I
don' know what template0 is used for either.  Is it pg_dumpall perhaps?

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: memory-related bugs
Next
From: Thom Brown
Date:
Subject: Re: template0 database comment