Re: pg_dump -X - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: pg_dump -X
Date
Msg-id 201103120336.p2C3a7O00270@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump -X  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump -X
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Bruce Momjian's message of vie mar 11 00:59:03 -0300 2011:
> 
> > > At a minimum, we should probably also remove -X no-security-label and
> > > -X no-unlogged-table-data, which don't exist in any released versions
> > > (unless you want to count alphas).  But considering that this has been
> > > deprecated and undocumented since 8.2, I think it might be time to
> > > pull the plug on -X altogether.
> > 
> > I remove the new -X options with the attached, applied patch.  The
> > existing options are not really costing us anything except a few lines
> > of code.
> 
> Given that, it seems pretty pointless to remove support for -X options
> that have existed for years.

I agree.  They are not documented and only are a few C lines.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikhil Sontakke
Date:
Subject: Re: Fwd: index corruption in PG 8.3.13
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: new keywords in 9.1