Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Date
Msg-id 201102170312.p1H3CDQ06535@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage  ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 20:53 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> > > In particular, getting rid of use of OpenSSL would not be sufficient
> > > to satisfy the most rabid GPL partisans that we were in compliance.
> > 
> > I've never heard anyone argue that position, don't believe anyone would,
> > and certainly don't agree with it.
> 
> Yeah I am not sure I can buy Tom's argument here. The GPL is fairly
> clear and is compatible with the BSD/Postgres license. 

Compatible if you want the result to be GPL, yes.  I hardly see that as
desirable.  I am unclear what is being said above.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Greg Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage