Re: updated patch for foreach stmt - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Stephen Frost
Subject Re: updated patch for foreach stmt
Date
Msg-id 20110208211616.GS4116@tamriel.snowman.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: updated patch for foreach stmt  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: updated patch for foreach stmt  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
* Pavel Stehule (pavel.stehule@gmail.com) wrote:
> There is only bad keywords in doc - SCALE instead SLICE and a maybe a
> usage of slicing need a example.

Err, yeah, a couple of stupid documentation issues, sorry about that.

commit 9460c0831f5de71e31823b7e9d8511d2d8124776
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date:   Tue Feb 8 16:15:03 2011 -0500

    Add ARRAY keyword to example, ewps.

commit 34a8ffd8d4cfe42bb4f698564f16bd468b9f2613
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date:   Tue Feb 8 16:14:17 2011 -0500

    Tabs are bad, mmmkay.

commit cf1ebcb7e4905cc31cd58b4fd9fa90cd488cc0c0
Author: Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Date:   Tue Feb 8 16:13:22 2011 -0500

    PL/PgSQL documentation cleanups

    SCALE -> SLICE (no clue where SCALE came from..) and clarify
    what a SLICE is, really.

    Thanks,

        Stephen

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-general 2011-1-21:] Are there any projects interested in object functionality? (+ rule bases)
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: postponing some large patches to 9.2