Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again... - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...
Date
Msg-id 201102042258.p14MwIV28696@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...  (Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Greg Smith wrote:
> Check out
> http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=postgres%2C+mysql%2C+oracle&relative=1&relative=1
> if you want to see the real story here.  Oracle has a large installed
> base, but it's considered a troublesome legacy product being replaced

+1 for Oracle being a "troublesome legacy product".

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Scott Marlowe
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: getting the most of out multi-core systems for repeated complex SELECT statements
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Slow count(*) again...