Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"? - Mailing list pgsql-docs

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Date
Msg-id 201102031654.p13GsTo09143@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?  (Satoshi Nagayasu <satoshi.nagayasu@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-docs
Satoshi Nagayasu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just found "PL" is explained as "Programming Languages"
> in the Acronyms section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/acronyms.html
>
> I think this should be "Procedural Languages" because
> "Procedural" is used in the Server Programming section.
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/server-programming.html
>
> I've created a patch, but which should we use?

"Procedural Languages" is correct.  Patch applied.  Thanks.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-docs by date:

Previous
From: Josh Kupershmidt
Date:
Subject: Re: PL - "Programming Languages" or "Procedural Languages"?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Change to kernel-resources