Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Alan Hodgson
Subject Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?
Date
Msg-id 201101271611.18465@hal.medialogik.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?  (Robert Schnabel <schnabelr@missouri.edu>)
Responses Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?  (Grant Johnson <grant@amadensor.com>)
Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?  (Scott Carey <scott@richrelevance.com>)
List pgsql-performance

On January 27, 2011, Robert Schnabel <schnabelr@missouri.edu> wrote:

> So my questions are 1) am I'm crazy for doing this, 2) would you change

> anything and 3) is it acceptable to put the xlog & wal (and perhaps tmp

> filespace) on a different controller than everything else? Please keep

> in mind I'm a geneticist who happens to know a little bit about

> bioinformatics and not the reverse. :-)

>

Putting the WAL on a second controller does help, if you're write-heavy.

I tried separating indexes and data once on one server and didn't really notice that it helped much. Managing the space was problematic. I would suggest putting those together on a single RAID-10 of all the 300GB drives (minus a spare). It will probably outperform separate arrays most of the time, and be much easier to manage.

--

A hybrid Escalade is missing the point much in the same way that having a diet soda with your extra large pepperoni pizza is missing the point.

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: david@lang.hm
Date:
Subject: Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?
Next
From: Robert Schnabel
Date:
Subject: Re: How to best use 32 15k.7 300GB drives?