Re: Database file copy - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Database file copy
Date
Msg-id 201101142011.p0EKBT812472@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Database file copy  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> The reason for wanting to deprecate and ultimately remove that
> >> syntax is so we can get rid of FREEZE as a reserved word.
> 
> > Oh, OK.  I can go along with that.  If we're going that route,
> > though, shouldn't we be getting support for the new syntax added, so
> > there can be a release or two supporting both?
> 
> You mean like 9.0?

FYI, I just checked and pg_upgrade does not run the VACUUM command at
all, but vacuumdb, and vacuumdb knows to use parentheses when connecting
to a >= 9.0 server.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + It's impossible for everything to be true. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: LOCK for non-tables