Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)
Date
Msg-id 201101121812.p0CICm021975@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: libpq documentation cleanups (repost 3)  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > > The attached patch is a collection of libpq documentation cleanups
> > > recommended in a list of changes emailed to me by Leslie S Satenstein.
> > >
> > > Leslie found a number of places our libpq documentation that were unclear
> > > or awkward, and this diff generated by me attempts to address them.
> > >
> > > I have already updated the documentation proofreading wiki:
> > >
> > > ? ? ? ?http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Documentation_Proofreading
> >
> > I don't think changing "see below" to "refer below" or "call" to
> > "execute" is an improvement; even if we did that uniformly throughout
> > our documentation, surely future editors are going to reuse those
> > phrasings.
> >
> > A lot of these other changes look pretty dubious too, although some
> > seem worthwhile.
>
> OK, that last part seems kind of vague.  ;-)  Can you hack up the diff
> to have just the changes you think are worthwhile?  You can just remove
> the parts of the diff you don't like.

Robert, here is a unified diff, which I think it easier to review for
single-line documention changes.

--
  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us
  EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com

  + It's impossible for everything to be true. +

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_depend explained
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Compatibility GUC for serializable