On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 12:24:19AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> I still think you're better off focusing first on the case where we
> can skip the whole nine yards, and doing this stuff as a follow-on
> patch. Trying to do too many things, especially possibly
> controversial stuff, especially in the last CommitFest, often ends up
> with the whole patch getting rejected, which makes no one happy.
> Submitting the smallest useful, self-contained change you can and then
> work up from there. Or at least split out the patch into parts that
> can be applied independently, so that if the eventual committer likes
> A but not B you at least get A in.
Will do. Thanks.
